15 Dec **The following outline is largely adapted from D. A. Carson, Exegetical Fallacies (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, ).[i]. LibraryThing Review. User Review – Jared_Runck – LibraryThing. This book is a handy summation of the major types of exegetical fallacies. It provides clear. Desiring God by John Piper Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis The Cross of Christ by John R.W. Stott Exegetical Fallacies by D.A. Carson Radical by David Platt.
|Published (Last):||7 April 2004|
|PDF File Size:||3.31 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.83 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Concluding Reflections Chapters one and two really focus on word-study and grammar fallacies as they pertain to the New Testament Greek. The latter group covers conditionals, the article, and relationships exebetical tenses in different clauses.
However, many sections were too technical for the average reader including those in ministry. Feb 05, Benjamin Thompson rated it it was amazing Shelves: Equivocal D a carson exegetical fallacies Overreaching the implications of an argument beyond what it proves so as to make the argument seem conclusive or decisive on some fallacifs.
This is an excellent, yet brief overview of the many different mistakes Christians and non-Christians make when interpreting the Bible. Three Modern Baptist Confessions. It is also brief and to the point. I would have to say d a carson exegetical fallacies I feel generous giving the book a single star because of one single factor: Logical fallacies abound as much as those related to word-study—in the contexts of original language study as well as in studies of translated Scriptures.
Most recent customer reviews.
Please try again later. Even if one only manages to tackle the word-study fallacies, he has covered the most common faults in reasoning he is likely to encounter. Purely Emotive Appeals— Assuming that emotional appeals based on sincerity and conviction can supplant the role of reason and logic. A brilliant little book that I will have to return to again. D a carson exegetical fallacies is here at his exegetical best. Negative Inferences— Assuming that if a proposition is true, then the negative inference ecegetical that proposition must d a carson exegetical fallacies be true.
Exegetical Fallacies – D. A. Carson – Google Books
It is here where the sobering remarks most prominently affect the reader’s heart and make him examine himself or herself more carefully when doing the task of exegesis or just the task of trying to understand God’s Word, period. The Article— Interpreting the meaning and use of the Greek article in terms of the English article.
Much of the word study and grammatical discussion is hard to follow because I don’t know the original Biblical languages and am not studying in them. Carson lays out well-thought cadson examples of each fallacy and notes the importance of being self-critical in investigating the Biblical text.
This chapter will d a carson exegetical fallacies helpful to second year Greek students in the vital task of bridging the d a carson exegetical fallacies between morphology and context. You’ve probably fallaciex this expressed as follows “God chose the 1st AD to reveal Jesus so that the NT could be expressed in Greek which is the most precise language.
I’ve read This book is a handy summation of the major types of exegetical fallacies. Semantic Anachronism— Reading a more recent meaning of a word back into earlier literature.
Ironically, he emphasizes the dangers of removing both substantive and linguistic context from exegetifal readings – students who memorize individual Bible verses, or preachers who jump from one bookmark to another are two noteworthy examples of this error.
Apr 17, Cbarrett rated it it was amazing. The two largest groups of fallacies Carson treats are those concerning individual words and logical errors. Gifting of the Kindle edition at the Kindle MatchBook price is not available. It is worthwhile for the serious D a carson exegetical fallacies student to know what is or is not sound reasoning. It assumes that you know at least some Greek. Rather, truth d a carson exegetical fallacies degrees of precision to it that do not invalidate it as being inaccurate simply because it could be stated with greater clarity.
As a result this book has prompted me to think more carefully of my interpretation of the Bible. D a carson exegetical fallacies work is a seminary-level text for which some knowledge of Greek is expected and biblical interpretation is already a habit. Published 5 months ago. Carson covers all the various areas of fallacies ranging from Word-Study, Grammatical, Logical, Presuppositional, and Historical fallacies.
Simplistic Appeals to Authority— Assuming d a carson exegetical fallacies appeals to authorities scholars, pastors, authors, speakers, etc. Mar 14, Guillaume Bourin rated it really liked it. Root fallacy — the meaning of a word is NOT necessarily bound up in its structure.
As Carson points out, preachers and Bible study leaders often know just enough Greek, but not enough to really understand the language. Presuppositional claims deal with the field of epistemology the study of knowledge-its source, nature, and scope and are highly nuanced and complex.
Some Pastoral Observations on the